Bigger, larger and unavoidable online advertising is coming
As I am working my way on thestar.com’s new redesign. We encountered one major issue with the new advertising sizes that are aligned with Online Publishers Association.
Push down – 970 pixel x 418 pixel
XXL box – 468 pixel x 648 pixel
Fixed Panel – 336 pixel x 860 pixel
We contracted out our new design to an outside company. Great, the new design already taken place, so how are we gonna implement the new design without disturbing the existing template?
Take a look of the new design layout wireframe.
The new design will be a 3 column layout. We will always have a leaderboard and a big box on the page. The content will follow by a major headline story and then a list of story line up. Everything looks good except the new humongous ads sizes break all the layout rule.
Problem: The new ad sizes does not fit with the new design! As always that advertiser wants their ad above-the-fold to get exposure. Our design was created and built before those new ad sizes. And of course the outside company is not gonna go back to the layout mode unless we slap them with more cash.
Solution: Tweak the layout in the most minimal way and keep everything on the page identical. In order to cut down the developer’s work, I had to take the existing layout and tweak the most minimal way so that we won’t need to touch the majority of the existing CSS stylesheet.
Push down advertising is the easiest to mock up because all you need is to push down all the content below navigation. Then again, it’s so huge that you can’t ignore.
Here’s a real example from businessinsider.com for push down advertisting.
XXL Ad gives me a headache. Ideally, we want to keep our 3 column layout, but this nasty size literally takes up half of the website width!!! So I had to reorganize the headline story content and have it share space with the XXL ad in it’s own box and push everything down.
Finally, the fixed panel. The width of fixed panel is 336pixel. It is literally 36 pixel wider than our right rail, which has our big box ad and all the related contents. And with 860pixel in height, there’s no way the headline story abstract can show that much copy to accommodate the height. Therefore I had to bring some story line up and shrink the width in order to accommodate the odd width size.
So why those large ad? I guess the advertisers are now aware the demand for premium inventory, and not just blinking skyscraper anymore.
- If advertisers really want to buy banners, they’ll do it for cheaper through an ad network.
- Banners are too easy to ignore. Demand-generation ads need to interrupt content (like they do everywhere but online).
- When people think of the banner, they think of a blinky, subprime mortgage ad where you have to shoot the duck.
After years of working as designer in the corporate environment, you will notice couple things
- Always design around advertisement
- Always provide the best above the fold exposure for advertisement
- Making online banner ads and sponsored by logo are like daily chore
I am not a big fan of advertisement, but what can you do? it pays everyone’s salary!






Contact Me
June 28th, 2009 at 1:03 pm
lol…why don’t they just buy a redirect from the main site to their microsite…at this rate…it won’t be news…it would be a hijacking
August 6th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Wow those are some large ads!
October 15th, 2009 at 11:33 am
I’ve noticed the 970 x 418 Push Down has really become quite prevalent on the larger sites like ESPN and TheStar.com. It’s actually quite annoying at times when a simple rollover opens the ad and it auto plays when fully expanded.
Though it still doesn’t beat the site I visited yesterday that had two pop-up ads with one laid on top of the other.